,jpeg/015/823/579/1280x720.2.jpg)
,jpeg/016/353/212/v2/320x180.203.jpg)
,jpeg/014/333/369/1280x720.4.jpg)
,jpeg/010/143/099/v2/320x180.243.jpg)
,jpeg/007/194/037/1280x720.3.jpg)
,jpeg/020/127/628/1280x720.5.jpg)
,jpeg/011/469/596/v2/320x180.244.jpg)
,jpeg/016/654/446/v2/320x180.253.jpg)
,jpeg/024/297/523/v2/320x180.225.jpg)
,jpeg/014/710/261/v2/320x180.243.jpg)
,jpeg/017/049/163/v2/320x180.255.jpg)
Commentaires
13
Connecte-toi ou inscris-toi pour publier des commentaires
For me, at least, part of it is that I don't find her particularly attractive until she gets excited—more properly, 'until she pirtrays excitement', she was an actress, and what she actually felt was _her_ business, not mine. (My guess: she was happy to be working something safer than prostitution, she was getting a little pleasure sometimes, and she was an actress for the rest.)
Regardless, we love female enthusiasm and pleasure so much it turns her into soneone much more atteactive than she'd been. Loni Sanders was simila for me; for me, Seka wax the opposite: conventionally pretty, but so technical and removed in her acting I liked her _less_ when in action.
Regardless, we love female enthusiasm and pleasure so much it turns her into soneone much more atteactive than she'd been. Loni Sanders was simila for me; for me, Seka wax the opposite: conventionally pretty, but so technical and removed in her acting I liked her _less_ when in action.
